Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1472

reference
912-tree-1
name
1472
tree-preservation-order

undefined

912-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.045578 50.867191)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.045522 50.867185,-1.045524 50.867196,-1.045532 50.867206,-1.045544 50.867214,-1.045560 50.867219,-1.045578 50.867221,-1.045595 50.867220,-1.045611 50.867215,-1.045624 50.867207,-1.045632 50.867197,-1.045635 50.867186,-1.045633 50.867174,-1.045625 50.867164,-1.045612 50.867156,-1.045597 50.867151,-1.045579 50.867149,-1.045562 50.867151,-1.045546 50.867156,-1.045533 50.867164,-1.045525 50.867174,-1.045522 50.867185)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL